Michael levins the case for torture essay

Stylistically, the article has a strong fluent tone. Saying to readers he prefers death to failure would logically mean that, even if tortured, the man is still not going to disclose the information because he would rather die than failing his mission in receiving his needs. We had better start thinking about this.

On explanation in archaeology: Levin starts with a scenario for his readers, one which is even more effective in current times. The Humanist 37, no. Americans would be angered to learn that Roosevelt could have had Hitler killed inthereby shortening the war and saving millions of lives, but refused on moral grounds.

The way he worded that may seem a bit too aggressive for a general audience. Suppose a terrorist group kidnapped a newborn baby from a hospital. It is more of an example to show what someone would do for their loved ones. The only attempt to reference a source is an informal poll from four anonymous mothers.

The name of their game is public recognition. The hypothetical cases Levin uses range from very extreme situations, to a situation where we may sometimes see on the news. Even if a person demands money and release of his friends from jail, Levin does not explain how somebody would go about finding this person wherever he is hiding.

Levin starts the article speaking of torture ONLY for the saving of innocent lives, but now, he speaks of torture for preserving order.

Michael Levin’s the Case for Torture (Review)

In the same way, if the police can by torture save those who would otherwise die at the hands of kidnappers or terrorists, they must. I believe this attitude is unwise. The Allies did assassinate Heydrich. He thinks if a person decides to oppose civilized standards, he should not expect to be treated with the same rights as the people who do follow civilized standards.

He goes on to restate this explanation, and give another example supporting it, through yet another scenario. The extensionality of causation and causal-explanatory contexts. Its weakness is clearly seen in the number of participants in the poll that he is using and in the biased opinion they most likely already had.

Suppose a terrorist group kidnapped a newborn baby from a hospital. Suppose a terrorist has hidden an atomic bomb on Manhattan Island which will detonate at noon on July 4 unless This leads to what he believes is the most powerful argument against torture. It is clearly an emotionally loaded sentence.

Donald James Gauvreau Nothing to it. The 2nd case speaks of a bomb on a jumbo jet. But I do think that the people who were already anti-torture surely hate this guy a bit more especially because of the attitude. In any case, I ask you to face the question with an open mind. The name of their game is public recognition.

But the terrorist knowingly initiated his actions. Enlightened societies reject it outright, and regimes suspected of using it risk the wrath of the United States.

You must now face more realistic cases involving more modest numbers. I asked four mothers if they would approve of torturing kidnappers if that were necessary to get their own newborns back.

Philosophy of Science 43, no. My response to the case for torture The Case for Torture article by Michael Levin published in Newsweek in ; it has started a firestorm of controversy between people who are for and against torture in many societies.

Michael Levin’s the Case for Torture (Review)

Nevertheless, this is only a minor thing, one which few will probably have noticed, and he proceeds smoothly to the next point: The 3rd hypothetical case is provided with results from a four person poll.

But torture, in the cases described, is intended not to bring anyone back but to keep innocents from being dispatched. The most powerful argument against using torture as a punishment or to secure confessions is that such practices disregard the rights of the individual.

Michael Levin

Michael Levin (/ ˈ l ɛ v ɪ n /; born 21 In the article "The Case for Torture" Levin argued that "there are situations where torture is not merely permissible but morally mandatory." Levin reiterated this view in Economics.

In “The Case for Torture,” philosophy professor Michael Levin argues the circumstances under which torture may be justified in a civil society. Click on the link to view the essay: “The Case for Torture” by Michael Levin. Michael Levin – a philosophy professor at city university of New York – talks about this torture case in his essay titled, “The Case for Torture”.

He believes that torture is needed in some sort of specific situation, especially when it comes to life of innocent people. An Argument on "The Case for Torture" "The Case for Torture" by Michael Levin is an argumentative piece on the subject of torture.

Levin discusses instances where torture is necessary to obtain information out of a criminal. /5(3). Related Documents: Essay about Michael Levin's the Case for Torture (Review) Torture Essay Schutt April Van Camp ENC_Tuesday/Thursday 10/15/ The Truth behind Torture Acts of interrogation or torture towards humans has many perspectives.

Michael levins the case for torture essay
Rated 4/5 based on 8 review
Michael Levin’s the Case for Torture (Review) | Free Essays - lookbeyondthelook.com